Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Heckel et al

Filing 22

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. A Motion Hearing was held on 3/30/2011. ORDERED: Harvest Gold Village Homeowners Association, Inc. Joinder in Heckel Defendants Second Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, doc # 19 , is DENIED. Answer due on or before APRIL 8, 2011. Heckel Defendants Motion to Stay Action, doc # 8 , is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Scheduling Conference currently set for April 25, 2011 at 9:15 a.m. is VACATED. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (FTR: Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action No.: 11-cv-00340-CMA-CBS Date: March 30, 2011 FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Linda Kahoe CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. LARRY HECKEL, et al., HARVEST GOLD VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendants. Douglas Adam Stevens Eric Edward Torgersen Alex Michael Nelson COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTION HEARING Court in session: 1:30 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion regarding Harvest Gold Village Homeowners Association, Inc. Joinder in Heckel Defendants' Second Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, doc #[19], filed 3/29/2011. ORDERED: Harvest Gold Village Homeowners Association, Inc. Joinder in Heckel Defendants' Second Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, doc #[19], is DENIED. Defendants must file an Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, doc #[1], on or before APRIL 8, 2011. The Defendants are not required to file counter-claims as of April 8th. The Defendants' obligation to file counter-claims will only be triggered once the stay as to Counts II and III is lifted. Discussion and arguments regarding Heckel Defendants' Motion to Stay Action, doc #[8], filed 3/10/2011. Discussion regarding Harvest Gold Village Homeowners Association, Inc. Joinder in Heckel Defendants' Motion to Stay Action, doc #[18], filed 3/29/2011. For the reasons as stated on the record, it is: ORDERED: Heckel Defendants' Motion to Stay Action, doc #[8], is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED with respects to Counts II and III. All discovery in this case related to Counts II and III is STAYED pending further order of this court. The Motion is DENIED as it relates to Count I. Plaintiff shall provide its Rule 26(a) disclosures directed to Count I within TWO WEEKS of today's date. Within 30 days after providing Rule 26(a) disclosures, Plaintiff may serve the limited discovery requests directed to the legal theory and specific facts alleged in Count I. Plaintiff is allowed to serve 10 interrogatories, 5 requests for production, and 5 requests for admission specifically limited in time and circumstance to statements or facts existing on or pre-dating the completion of the questionnaire addressed in Count I. Plaintiff shall not pursue any discovery relating to statements made by Larry Heckel in his individual capacity, or statements made by Larry Heckel on behalf of Heckel Construction, if those statements occurred after the date of the questionnaire. Plaintiff is not allowed to conduct discovery relating to events that post-date the completion of the questionnaire. The parties shall not take any depositions in this case without leave of court. Defendants are not required to serve Rule 26(a) disclosures. ORDERED: The Scheduling Conference currently set for April 25, 2011 at 9:15 a.m. is VACATED. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: Total time in court: 2:33 p.m. 01:03 To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?