Martinez v. Adams County School District 14 et al

Filing 101

ORDER. Defendants' 100 Motion to Strike the 96 Notice of Settlement is granted. Plaintiff's 96 Motion to Vacate Further Proceedings is denied. All deadlines, including those for filing plaintiff's proposed voir dire questions and witness and exhibit lists, are still in effect. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 12/17/12.(mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00372-PAB-CBS
DEBORAH MARTINEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
ADAMS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 14,
LYNN HEINTZMAN, in her individual capacity,
PHIL BEDFORD, in his individual capacity,
HOLLENE DAVIS, in her individual capacity, and
SUE CHANDLER, in her individual capacity,
Defendants.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement and
Motion to Vacate Further Proceedings [Docket No. 96] and defendants’ Motion to Strike
and Objection to Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement and Motion to Vacate Further
Proceedings [Docket No. 100]. Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement states that a settlement
was reached between the parties, but that plaintiff received no response to her attempts
to confer about Docket No. 96 with opposing counsel and therefore assumes that it is
opposed. A settlement that the opposing party objects to is no settlement at all. This
was later confirmed by Docket No. 100, which indicates that no settlement has been
reached and that the parties are still negotiating. Wherefore, it is
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Strike [Docket No. 100] the Notice of
Settlement [Docket No. 96] is granted. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Further Proceedings is denied. All
deadlines, including those for filing plaintiff’s proposed voir dire questions and witness
and exhibit lists, are still in effect.

DATED December 17, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge

2