Franks v. Flint McClung Capital, LLC et al
Filing
109
ORDER. Attorney James E. Preston shall be removed as counsel of record for plaintiff in this case. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/27/11. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00407-PAB-BNB
JAMES C. FRANKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
FLINT-MCCLUNG CAPITAL, LLC,
SHAWON MCCLUNG,
BRYAN FLINT dba, and
HEIDI ARNDT,
Defendants.
ORDER
On October 18, 2011, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause [Docket No.
108] why James E. Preston failed to withdraw from his representation of plaintiff James
C. Franks. The Order required Mr. Preston to show cause by October 24, 2011 as to
why he should not be compelled to withdraw from the above captioned action based on
his suspension. Docket No. 108 at 1. Mr. Preston failed to respond.
An attorney admitted to the bar of this court must remain in good standing in all
courts where admitted. D.C.COLO.LCiv.R 83.3E. “In good standing” means not
subject to suspension or disbarment by any court for any reason. Id. On October 3,
2011, the Colorado Supreme Court suspended Mr. Preston from the practice of law.
Mr. Preston’s current bar status in Colorado is “suspended,” meaning that he is not in
good standing and ineligible to practice before this Court. Further, Mr. Preston failed to
provide the Court with any reason why he should have relief from the rule of good
standing as set forth in D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.3F. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that attorney James E. Preston shall be REMOVED as counsel of
record for plaintiff in this case. It is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff
at the following address: 1205 Holly Hill Dr., Franklin, Tennessee 37064 [Docket No.
65-1 at 16].
DATED October 27, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?