Franks v. Flint McClung Capital, LLC et al
Filing
174
ORDER : denying 145 Heidi Arndts Motion to Strike James Franks Response to Motion to Compel; denying 166 Motion for Order; denying 167 Motion for Order. Order to show cause is discharged.Final Pretrial Order refused, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/1/12.(bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00407-PAB-BNB
JAMES FRANKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
FLINT-MCCLUNG CAPITAL, LLC,
SHAWON MCCLUNG and
BRYANT FLINT d/b/a, and
HEIDI ARNDT,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter was set for a final pretrial conference to occur this afternoon at 1:30 p.m. See
Scheduling Order [Doc. # 50, filed 6/1/2011] at p. 8. All parties are proceeding pro se.1
Only the plaintiff appeared at the final pretrial conference. None of the defendants
appeared. In this regard, it was apparent to me that a final pretrial order could be successfully
entered in the case only if all parties attended the final pretrial conference in person.
Consequently, I denied the last minute motions of defendants Heidi Arndt and Bryan Flint to
appear at the conference by telephone. See Minute Order [Doc. # 161, filed 1/30/2012] and
Minute Order [Doc. # 165, filed 1/31/2012].
I made a number of rulings on the record during the final pretrial conference, which are
1
Flint-McClung Capital, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, is named in the
Complaint as a defendant. There is no indication in the record that it has been served with
process, and it has not appeared in the action.
incorporated here. Consistent with matters discussed at the final pretrial conference,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The proposed Final Pretrial Order is REFUSED;
(2)
My Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 134] is DISCHARGED;
(3)
Heidi Arndt’s Motion to Strike James Franks Response to Motion to Compel
[sic] [Doc. # 145, filed 1/4/2012], which I construe as a motion to strike Mr. Franks’ response to
the Order to Show Cause, is DENIED;
(4)
Bryan Flint’s Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 166, filed 1/30/2012], which is
indecipherable, is DENIED; and
(5)
Bryan Flint’s Regarding Stricken Affidavit On June 6th 2011 [Doc. # 167,
filed 1/30/2012], which I construe as a motion to file answer out of time, is DENIED as
premature.
Dated February 1, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?