Anderson v. Worstell et al

Filing 40

ORDER Denying 38 Motion to Compel Appellants to Order and Pay for Transcript of Hearing, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/5/2011.(rpmcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00488-RPM
MITCHELL ANDERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
B. WORSTELL, (No. 2172) individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and
as an employee and/or agent of the Colorado Springs Police Department and the City
of Colorado Springs;
C. CALKINS, (No. 2047) individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and as
an employee and/or agent of the Colorado Springs Police Department and the City of
Colorado Springs;
COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its capacity as an agent and/or
independent contractor of the City of Colorado Springs;
THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, in its capacity as a governmental entity and as
the employer of Officers Worstell and Calkins and the Colorado Springs Police
Department;
JOHN DOES 1-7, whose names and identities are unknown, individually and in their
capacity as governmental officers or employees, peace officers, and/or agents of the
Colorado Springs Police Department and/or the City of Colorado Springs; and
LISA N. PIEL,
Defendants.
_____
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL APPELLANTS TO ORDER AND PAY FOR
TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING

On August 16, 2011, the plaintiff filed a motion to compel appellants to order and pay for transcript
for July 14, 2011, hearing pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 10(b)(3). The defendants (appellants) filed their
response on August 17, 2011. There was no reply. Because the requested transcript is not necessary
and the motion is not timely, it is
ORDERED that the motion is denied.
Dated: October 5th, 2011
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge