Self v. I Have A Dream Foundation - Colorado

Filing 76

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 2/16/2012. For reasons as stated on the record, the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 62 Motion for Extension of Time. The court DENIES, f or failure to comply with the local rules, 71 Motion to Compel. The plaintiff may re-file this motion on or before 2/23/2012. The court DENIES, as premature, 74 Motion for Leave. A further Status Conference is set for 3/20/2012 11:30 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (FTR: Robin Mason) (cbscd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action: 11-cv-00492-PAB-CBS
Date: February 16, 2012

FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason

Parties:

Counsel:

DONITA L. SELF,

Pro Se

Plaintiff,

v.
I HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION COLORADO,

William A. Rogers , III

Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: MOTION HEARING
Court in Session:
3:02 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Ms. Donita Self appears pro se.
Discussion regarding plaintiff’s MOTION to Extend the Discovery Period (Docket No. 62, filed on
1/18/2012), Rule 26(b)(1), and the non-parties that the court will allow the plaintiff to serve
subpoenas on. Counsel for the defendant informs the court that they are willing to make some
stipulations, on the record, that addresses the plaintiff’s subpoena request for CiviCore.
ORDERED: As outlined on the record, the court GRANTS in PART and DENIES in PART
plaintiff’s Discussion regarding plaintiff’s MOTION to Extend the Discovery Period
(Docket No. 62, filed on 1/18/2012).
Discussion regarding plaintiff’s MOTION to Compel Responses to Interrogatories, Production of
Documents and Responses from Defendant and CONVENTIONALLY SUBMITTED MATERIAL:
1 Binder of Exhibits A to V and 1 Envelope containing transcript of a depostition [sic] on
10/25/2011 (Docket No. 71, filed on 2/01/2012) and plaintiff’s MOTION for Leave to Serve
Additional Interrogatories (Docket No. 74, filed on 2/13/2012). Counsel for the defendant informs

the court that he would possibly like to waive filing a response to either of these motions.
Discussion regarding the close of discovery, the parties having a meet and confer, and the
defendant’s ability to file a Motion for Summary Judgment.
ORDERED: The court DENIES, for failure to comply with the local rules, plaintiff’s MOTION
to Compel Responses to Interrogatories, Production of Documents and Responses
from Defendant and CONVENTIONALLY SUBMITTED MATERIAL: 1 Binder
of Exhibits A to V and 1 Envelope containing transcript of a depostition [sic] on
10/25/2011 (Docket No. 71, filed on 2/01/2012). The plaintiff may re-file this
motion on or before February 23, 2012.
ORDERED: The court DENIES, as premature, plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to Serve
Additional Interrogatories (Docket No. 74, filed on 2/13/2012). The court advises
the plaintiff that she will need to know what she wants to do with the Motion to
Compel before she can move forward with this motion.
Discussion regarding time line for moving this case forward, how the plaintiff and counsel for the
defendant would like to receive subpoena responses, Rule 37, due date for dispositive motions, the
length of time the plaintiff should give the non-parties to respond to the subpoenas, how to serve the
subpoenas on the non-parties, and previously quashed subpoenas.
ORDERED: The court will stay all dispositive motion deadlines and briefing. The court has set
a Further Status Conference for March 20, 2012 at 11:30 a.m. at which time the
parties will revisit this subject.
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess:
Total time in court:

5:09 p.m.
02:07

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)
825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.