McCarty v. Dunn

Filing 37

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Granting 36 Motion To Reopen This Action and Dismiss it With Prejudice. This action is now DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/14/12. (kfinn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No.11-cv-00543-REB-CBS TODD M. McCARTY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. DAVID DUNN, Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Motion To Reopen This Action and Dismiss it With Prejudice [#36]1 filed November 14, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted, that this case should be reopened, and that this case should then be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Motion To Reopen This Action and Dismiss it With Prejudice [#36] filed November 14, 2012, is GRANTED; 2. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, the clerk is DIRECTED to reopen this civil action; and 1 “[#36]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 3. That this action is now DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated November 14, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?