Maisel v. Erickson Construction, Inc. et al

Filing 174

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Stipulated Motion For Dismissal With Prejudice 173 is GRANTED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/1/2012.(kfinn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 11-cv-00555-REB-KLM ELLIOT B. MAISEL, Plaintiff, v. ERICKSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation, RICKIE DEAN ERICKSON, individually, CHARLES L. CUNNIFFE, individually, d/b/a Charles Cunniffe & Assoc, Architects, ALPINE HEATING AND SHEET METAL, INC., a Colorado corporation, and THE LOG CONNECTION, INC., a Colorado corporation, Defendants; ERICKSON CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Colorado corporation, RICKIE DEAN ERICKSON, individually, Cross-Claimants. CHARLES L. CUNNIFFE, individually, d/b/a Charles Cunniffee & Assoc, Architects, COG PLUMBING & HEATING , INC., a Colorado corporation, Cross Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Stipulated Motion For Dismissal With Prejudice [#173]1 filed October 1, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice. 1 “[#173]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulated Motion For Dismissal With Prejudice [#173] filed October 1, 2012, is GRANTED; 2. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and 3. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated October 1, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?