Mason v. Hartley et al

Filing 64

MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion for Clarification 61 is GRANTED. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/4/2012.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00578-REB-KLM
SCOTT MASON,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVE HARTLEY, Warden Fremont Corr. Fac.,
MR. HUGHES, Commander FCF S.E.R.T.,
C/O FRANCIS, FCF S.E.R.T., and
J. DOE, FCF Health Serv. Admin.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification [Docket No.
61; Filed January 3, 2012] (the “Motion”). Plaintiff requests a clarification with respect to
the Minute Entry [#61] for the Scheduling Conference held on August 18, 2011. The
language at issue states: “Each side shall be limited to 15 interrogatories, 15 requests for
production of documents, and 15 requests for admissions.” See Minute Entry [#61] at 2.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED, and the Court clarifies as
follows: Plaintiff may only submit a total of 15 interrogatories to Defendants, not 15
interrogatories to each Defendant. Similarly, Defendants collectively may only submit a
total of 15 interrogatories to Plaintiff. If Plaintiff believes that more than 15 interrogatories
are necessary, he must file a motion with the Court making the request and stating with
specificity why more than 15 interrogatories are required for the development of his case.

Dated: January 4, 2012