Smith v. Miller et al

Filing 52

ORDER. The Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs First, Fourth, Fifth,Eighth and Ninth Claims For Relief 51 filed 1/12/2012, is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/13/2012.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 11-cv-00613-REB-KLM TIMOTHY W. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ALAN K. MILLER, (agent of named political subdivision) in individual capacity, DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY (an autonomous political subdivision of the State of Colorado), and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST, FOURTH, FIFTH, EIGHTH AND NINTH CLAIMS FOR RELIEF Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Ninth Claims For Relief [#51]1 filed January 12, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that plaintiff’s First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Ninth claims for relief should be dismissed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth and Ninth Claims For Relief [#51] filed January 12, 2012, is GRANTED; 1 “[#51]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That plaintiff’s First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Ninth claims for relief are DISMISSED. Dated January 13, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?