Smith v. Miller et al

Filing 72

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation to Dismiss 71 is APPROVED. The jury trial set for 4/9/2012 is VACATED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs, except to the extent defendant, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, has any obligation under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act to pay the fees adn costs of defendant, Alan K. Miller. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/12/2012. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 11-cv-00613-REB-KLM TIMOTHY W. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. ALAN K. MILLER, (agent of named political subdivision) in individual capacity, DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY (an autonomous political subdivision of the State of Colorado), and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulation To Dismiss [#71]1 filed March 9, 2012. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation To Dismiss [#71] filed March 9, 2012, is APPROVED; 2. That the jury trial set to commence April 9, 2012, is VACATED; 3. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and 4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs, except to the extent defendant, Denver Health and 1 “[#71]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. Hospital Authority, has any obligation under the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act to pay the fees and costs of defendant, Alan K. Miller. Dated March 12, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?