Ettawil v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
Filing
27
ORDER. All pending deadlines and hearings (including the Bank Defendants and Radians deadline to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint on or before 7/8/2011 are hereby vacated. If for any reason the parties become unable to finalize the settlement and submit settlement papers to the Court by 8/18/2011, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report advising the Court of the current status of the case. By Judge David M. Ebel on 7/11/2011. (sah, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-00628-DME-MJW
NINA ETTAWIL,
Plaintiff,
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY; INDYMAC
FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.; RADIAN GUARANTY INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER VACATING CURRENT DEADLINES AND ISSUING NEW REPORTING
DATE OF AUGUST 18, 2011
This matter comes before the Court whereby Plaintiff Nina Ettawil and defendants
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Indymac Financial Services, Inc. n/k/a OneWest Bank,
FSB (collectively, the “Bank Defendants”), and Radian Guaranty, Inc. (“Radian”) have reached a
settlement and are in the process of drafting and finalizing the settlement agreement and thus
jointly move the Court to administratively close this case pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR 41.2
[Doc. No. 26]. The Court has reviewed the motion and is otherwise sufficiently advised in the
premises. All pending deadlines and hearings (including the Bank Defendants and Radian’s
deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before July 8, 2011) are hereby vacated. If for
any reason the parties become unable to finalize the settlement and submit settlement papers to
the Court by August 18, 2011, the parties are ORDERED to file a joint status report advising the
Court of the current status of the case.
SIGNED this 11th day of July, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ David M. Ebel
The Honorable David M. Ebel
{DN100565;1}
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?