Fowler et al v. Evercare Hospice, Inc. et al

Filing 100

MINUTE ORDER granting 97 Motion for Leave to File Out-of-Time Response to Relators' Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file Exhibit A, "Motion to Dismiss Relators' Second Amended Qui Tam Complaint," of [#97] as of this date, March 23, 2015 by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/23/15.(jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00642-PAB-NYW (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 14-cv-1647-PAB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., TERRY LEE FOWLER, and LYSSA TOWL, Plaintiff, v. EVERCARE HOSPICE, INC., n/k/a OPTUM PALLIATIVE AND HOSPICE CARE, a Delaware corporation, OVATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and OPTUMHEALTH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, and UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware limited liability corporation, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 14-cv-1647-PAB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. SHARLENE RICE, Plaintiff, v. EVERCARE HOSPICE, INC., Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang This matter is before the Court on Defendants Evercare Hospice, Inc. (“Evercare”), Ovations, Inc. (“Ovations”), and OptumHealth Holdings, LLC’s (“Optum”) (collectively “Evercare”) Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Out-of-Time Response to Relators’ Second Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). [#97, filed March 18, 2015]. The matter is before this Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order of Reference dated March 21, 2011 [#3] and the memorandum dated March 20, 2015 [#99]. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED; the Clerk is directed to file Exhibit A, “Motion to Dismiss Relators’ Second Amended Qui Tam Complaint,” of [#97] as of this date, March 23, 2015. DATED: March 23, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?