Fowler et al v. Evercare Hospice, Inc. et al
Filing
100
MINUTE ORDER granting #97 Motion for Leave to File Out-of-Time Response to Relators' Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk is directed to file Exhibit A, "Motion to Dismiss Relators' Second Amended Qui Tam Complaint," of [#97] as of this date, March 23, 2015 by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/23/15.(jhawk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00642-PAB-NYW
(Consolidated with Civil Action No. 14-cv-1647-PAB)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., TERRY LEE FOWLER, and LYSSA TOWL,
Plaintiff,
v.
EVERCARE HOSPICE, INC., n/k/a OPTUM PALLIATIVE AND HOSPICE CARE, a
Delaware corporation,
OVATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
OPTUMHEALTH, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, and
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware limited liability corporation,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 14-cv-1647-PAB
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. SHARLENE RICE,
Plaintiff,
v.
EVERCARE HOSPICE, INC.,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Evercare Hospice, Inc. (“Evercare”),
Ovations, Inc. (“Ovations”), and OptumHealth Holdings, LLC’s (“Optum”) (collectively
“Evercare”) Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Out-of-Time Response to Relators’ Second
Amended Complaint (the “Motion”). [#97, filed March 18, 2015]. The matter is before this
Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order of Reference dated March 21, 2011 [#3] and the
memorandum dated March 20, 2015 [#99].
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED; the Clerk is directed to file Exhibit A,
“Motion to Dismiss Relators’ Second Amended Qui Tam Complaint,” of [#97] as of this date,
March 23, 2015.
DATED: March 23, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?