Booker et al v. City and County of Denver et al

Filing 22

ORDER setting Settlement Conference for 10/12/2011 09:30 AM in Courtroom C201 before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/14/2011. (kmtcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 11–cv–00645–WYD–KMT

ESTATE OF MARVIN L. BOOKER,
REVEREND B.R. BOOKER, SR., and
ROXEY A. WALTON, as Co-Personal Representatives,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER,
DEPUTY FAUN GOMEZ, individually and in her official capacity,
DEPUTY JAMES GRIMES, individually and in his official capacity,
DEPUTY KYLE SHARP, individually and in his official capacity,
DEPUTY KENNETH ROBINETTE, individually and in his official capacity, and
SERGEANT CARRIE RODRIGUEZ, individually and in her official capacity,
Defendants.

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

A settlement conference is hereby scheduled in this case for October 12, 2011 in
Courtroom C-201, Second Floor of the Byron Rogers U.S. Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street,
Denver, Colorado. The conference will begin at 9:30 a.m.
Counsel shall have parties present who shall have full authority to negotiate all terms and
demands presented by the case, and full authority to enter into a settlement agreement, including
an adjustor if an insurance company is involved. The presence of an insurance adjustor,
however, does not excuse the attendance of the party represented.
“Full authority” means that the person who attends the settlement conference has
the complete and unfettered capacity and authority to meet or pay all terms or amounts
which are demanded or sought by the other side of the case without consulting with some
other person, committee or agency. If the representative attending the settlement conference
can only receive authority to increase a pre-determined amount of money by making a telephone

call to someone else, the person to whom the phone call is made is the correct participant in the
settlement conference. If any person has limits upon the extent or amount within which he or
she is authorized to settle on behalf of a party, that person does not have “full authority.” This
requirement is not fulfilled by the presence of counsel.
The court will consider awarding attorneys fees and costs against a participant in a
settlement conference who arrives at the conference without full authority as outlined
above.
No party or party representative shall be permitted to participate in the settlement
conference by telephone, unless that party has obtained leave of court following the filing of an
appropriate motion no later than five business days prior to the settlement conference date. Such
requests are not favored by the court.
No person is ever required to settle a case on any particular terms or amounts. However,
again, if any person attends the settlement conference without full authority, and the case fails to
settle, that party may be ordered to pay the attorney’s fees and costs for the other side.
In order that productive settlement discussions can be held, counsel shall prepare and
submit two settlement documents: one to be submitted to the other party or parties, and one
Confidential Settlement Statement to be submitted by e-mail only to Magistrate Judge Tafoya.
The documents which are presented to opposing counsel shall contain an overview of the case
from the presenter’s point of view, shall summarize the evidence which support that side’s
claims, and may present a demand or offer. These documents should be intended to persuade the
clients and counsel on the other side.
The Confidential Settlement Statement prepared for and presented to Magistrate Judge
Tafoya should contain the following information:
1.

A summary of the evidence, including:
a.

a numbered list of the known significant disputed issues of fact; and

b.

a numbered list of the known significant disputed legal issues.

2.

A candid assessment of the case from the presenter’s point of view.

3.

Remarks toward any perceived weaknesses in the case.

4.

An accurate and complete history of settlement negotiations, including dates, if
known, and amounts of demands and offers.
-2-

5.

A computation of damages, including the theory of calculation and any legal
limitations on damages, and a demand or offer each client will accept or pay in
settlement (including any essential non-economic terms).

6.

Any observations or additional information which would be helpful to Magistrate
Judge Tafoya in assisting the parties to negotiate a settlement.

The document is to be emailed to Magistrate Judge Tafoya (not submitted for filing to
the court) at [e-mail], in accordance with the electronic filing
procedures of this court, and shall contain copies of the materials submitted to the other parties.
The settlement documents shall be submitted no later than five business days prior to the date
of the settlement conference.
If the parties’ Confidential Settlement Statement and exhibits are not filed by the
deadline set by the court, the settlement conference will be vacated.
Extensions of the deadline to file Confidential Settlement Statements require a showing
of good cause and should be sought by filing an appropriate motion. Extensions must be sought
before the deadline expires.
Counsel and the parties should plan to remain at the settlement conference for at least
four hours after it begins. You will not be permitted to leave before that time for any reason,
unless excused by Magistrate Judge Tafoya. Travel arrangements should be made accordingly.
Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron Rogers United States
Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.
Dated this 14th day of June, 2011.
BY THE COURT:

Kathleen M. Tafoya
United States Magistrate Judge

-3-