Allen v. Clements et al
Filing
45
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 42 Notice of Appeal by Edward Allen, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/05/11. (bjrsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00657-LTB
EDWARD ALLEN,
Applicant,
v.
TOM CLEMENTS, and
JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado,
Respondents.
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL
Babcock, Senior Judge
Applicant has submitted a Motion for Permission to Appeal, which has been processed as a Notice
of Appeal. Applicant previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915
in this court in this action. The court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in
forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate
Procedure, the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because applicant has not shown the
existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on
appeal. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not
taken in good faith.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this 5th day of December, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
SENIOR JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?