Konkol v. Astrue
Filing
10
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/9/2011. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/8/2011. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/23/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/29/11. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00660-AP
______________________________________________________________________________
WALTER L. KONKOL,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
______________________________________________________________________________
1.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Michael Desaulniers, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
seckarlaw@mindspring.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
Kevin T. Traskos
Civil Chief
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
William G. Pharo
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 844-0815
Stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
1
2.
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
' 405(g).
3.
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
C.
4.
Date Complaint was filed:
Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney=s Office:
Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed:
March 16, 2011
April 7, 2011
June 9, 2011
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is
complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
6.
STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASES RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the cases raises unusual claims
or defenses.
7.
OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.
8.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule:
A.
B.
C.
9.
Plaintiff’s opening brief due
Defendant’s response brief due
Plaintiff’s reply brief (if any) due
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.
Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant does not request oral argument.
2
August 9, 2011
September 8, 2011
September 23, 2011
10.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11.
OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR
CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 7.1(C) BY
SUBMITTING PRROF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED
UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 29th day of June, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
3
APPROVED:
s/ Michael A. Desaulniers___
Michael A. Desaulniers, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
KEVIN T. TRASKOS
Civil Chief
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
s/Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 844-0815
Stephanie.kiley@ssa.gov
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?