Galloway v. Astrue

Filing 14

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/25/2011. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/24/2011. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/8/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/13/11. (gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00685-AP JOHN MICHAEL GALLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: For Defendant: WILLIAM T. DAWSON William T. Dawson, L.L.C. 2546 15th Street Denver, CO 80211 Telephone: (303) 455-0400 Facsimile: (303) 433-4231 williamtdawson@gmail.com JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney District of Colorado KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney’s Office WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney ALEXESS D. REA Special Assistant United States Attorney 1001 17th Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-7101 Facsimile: (303)454-0770 alexess.rea@ssa.gov -1- 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: March 18, 2011 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: March 24, 2011 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: May 23, 2011 (Answer) and May 24, 2011 (Administrative Record) 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD At this time, the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties do not foresee offering any unusual claims or defenses in this case. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties are not aware of any other matters at this time. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE Counsel for both parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule: A. Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due: July 25, 2011 B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due: August 24, 2011 C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: September 8, 2011 -2- 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiff’s Statement: Plaintiff requests oral argument. B. Defendant’s Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. B. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C.Colo.LCivR. 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorney’s client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 13th day of June, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE -3- APPROVED: For Plaintiff: For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney District of Colorado s/ William T. Dawson WILLIAM T. DAWSON William T. Dawson, L.L.C. 2546 15th Street Denver, CO 80211 Telephone: (303) 455-0400 Facsimile: (303) 433-4231 williamtdawson@gmail.com KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney’s Office WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff s/ Alexess D. Rea ALEXESS D. REA Special Assistant United States Attorney 1001 17th Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-7101 Facsimile: (303) 454-0770 alexess.rea@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?