Nova Leasing, LLC v. Sun River Energy, Inc. et al
Filing
227
ORDER denying as moot 175 Renewed, Partial Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant Sun River Energy, Inc.'s Counterclaims against Plaintiff Nova Leasing, LLC. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 06/12/13. (alvsl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00689-RM-BNB
NOVA LEASING, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUN RIVER ENERGY, INC.,
HARRY N. MCMILLAN, an individual,
CICERONE CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT, a Texas limited liability company, and
J.H. BRECH, LLC, a Texas limited liability company,
Defendants,
v.
MICHAEL LITTMAN,
Third-Party Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
“NOVA’S RENEWED, PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ON DEFENDANT SUN RIVER ENERGY, INC.’S COUNTERCLAIMS
AGAINST PLAINTIFF NOVA LEASING, LLC” (ECF NO. 175)
______________________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. By Order of Dismissal with
Prejudice dated May 30, 2013 (ECF No. 219), upon Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
(ECF No. 218) filed by certain parties, this Court dismissed with prejudice all of Nova Leasing,
LLC’s (“Nova”) claims against Sun River Energy, Inc. (“Sun River”) and all of Sun River’s
counterclaims against Nova. In light of the foregoing, Nova’s “Renewed, Partial Motion for
Summary Judgment on Defendant Sun River Energy, Inc.’s Counterclaims against Plaintiff Nova
Leasing, LLC” (ECF No. 175) is hereby DENIED as MOOT.
DATED this 12th day of June, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?