Nova Leasing, LLC v. Sun River Energy, Inc. et al

Filing 24

ORDER Denying as moot 10 Defendant Sun River Energy, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss; Denying as moot 11 Defendant Sun River Energy, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss; Denying as moot 19 Defendant Mountain Share Transfer, Inc.s Motion for Joinder of Defendant Sun River Energy, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss and Mountain Share Transfer, Inc.s Motion In the Alternative to Stay by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/4/2011.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 11-cv-00689-CMA-BNB NOVA LEASING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SUN RIVER ENERGY, INC., and MOUNTAIN SHARE TRANSFER, INC., Defendants. ORDER REGARDING “MOTION FOR STAY” This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Mountain Share Transfer, Inc.’s Alternative Motion for Stay (Doc. # 23). Upon review, the Court notes that the parties apparently acknowledge that the Amended complaint renders moot the motions to dismiss (Doc. ## 10 and 11) and the motion for joinder (Doc. # 19). However, the parties seem to believe that the alternative motion to stay (set forth in Doc. # 19) remains pending. The Court disagrees. In the interest of maintaining a clean record, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. That Defendant Sun River Energy, Inc.’s Motions to Dismiss (Doc. ## 10 and 11), and Defendant Mountain Share Transfer, Inc.’s Joinder of Defendant Sun River Energy, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss and Mountain Share Transfer, Inc.’s Motion In the Alternative to Stay (Doc. # 19) are DENIED AS MOOT, in light of the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint; and 2. That any motion to stay should be refiled only after the filing of a Motion to Dismiss. DATED: May 04 , 2011 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?