Shrank v. Astrue

Filing 14

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/23/2011. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/22/2011. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/6/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 6/13/11. (gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00693-AP JULIE A. SHRANK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Alan M. Agee 512 S. 8th Street Colorado Springs, CO 80905 (719) 473-1515 ageealanmpc@qwestoffice.net For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney Kevin T. Traskos Deputy Civil Chief United States Attorney’s Office District of Colorado William G. Pharo United States Attorney Office District of Colorado Michael Howard Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 17th St. Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 844-7192 Michael.howard@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint was filed: March 18, 2011 B. Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: March 21, 2011 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: May 23, 2011 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD Plaintiff's counsel states that the administrative record may be missing records that have previously been submitted to the Appeals Council. Otherwise the administrative record is complete. Defendant's counsel states, to the best of his knowledge, that the administrative record is complete. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Plaintiff does not intend to submit additional evidence unless records are missing that have been previously submitted to the Appeals Council. Defendant does not intend to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASES RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. 2 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule A. Plaintiff’s opening brief due: July 23, 2011 B. Defendant’s response brief due: August 22, 2011 C. Plaintiff’s reply brief (if any) due: September 6, 2011 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. 10. Plaintiff requests oral argument. Defendant does not request oral argument. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 13th day of June, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 3 APPROVED: /s/ Alan M. Agee Alan M. Agee 512 S. 8th Street Colorado Springs, CO 80905 (719) 473-1515 ageealanmpc@qwestoffice.net John F. Walsh United States Attorney Kevin T. Traskos Deputy Civil Chief United States Attorney’s Office District of Colorado William G. Pharo United States Attorney Office District of Colorado /s/ Michael S. Howard Michael Howard Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 17th St. Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 844-7192 Michael.howard@ssa.gov 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?