Morris v. Colorado Housing and Finance Authority et al

Filing 78

ORDER. All claims by and between plaintiff and defendants are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This case shall be closed in its entirety. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/9/12. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 11-cv-00702-PAB-CBS LLOYD E. MORRIS, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO HOUSING AND FINANCE AUTHORITY (CHFA), et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice [Docket No. 77] filed by plaintiff Lloyd E. Morris and defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, and Lynn M. Janeway. The parties “stipulate to dismissal with prejudice of this civil action.” The stipulation, however, was not signed by “by all parties who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); see Anderson-Tully Co. v. Federal Ins. Co., 347 F. App’x 171, 176 (6th Cir. 2009) (under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), “all parties who have appeared” includes both current and former parties). As a result, the Stipulation of Dismissal, by itself, does not serve to dismiss this action. The Court, however, having reviewed the stipulation, finds that dismissal is appropriate. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), it is ORDERED that all claims by and between plaintiff and defendants are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. It is further ORDERED that this case shall be closed in its entirety. DATED February 9, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?