Frey v. Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc.
Filing
100
ORDER on Defendants' Motion to Compel 99 : the deadline for the completion of expert depositions is extended to October 16, 2013, and the plaintiff shall produce their three experts for depositions before that date; the motion to compel the pr oduction of Dr. Frey's tax returns is denied on the ground that such discovery is not necessary because the plaintiff's alleged monetary loss due to changes in tax rates is not a proper element of damages; the defendants' motion for expedited briefing 97 is moot, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/16/2013.(rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00767-RPM
DR. GEORGE FREY, M.D., a Colorado Citizen,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC., and
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., an Indiana corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
On September 13, 2013, the defendants moved to compel the plaintiff to produce three
expert witnesses for deposition and to compel production of the plaintiff’s tax returns for the
years 2000 to the present. The defendants also requested expedited briefing of the motion to
compel.
Upon review of the motion to compel [#94], the disputes described in that motion are
resolved as follows. It is
ORDERED that the deadline for the completion of expert depositions is extended to
October 16, 2013, and the plaintiff shall produce their three experts for depositions before that
date; and it is
-1-
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to compel the production of Dr. Frey’s tax
returns is denied on the ground that such discovery is not necessary because the plaintiff’s
alleged monetary loss due to changes in tax rates is not a proper element of damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for expedited briefing [#97] is moot.
Date: September 16, 2013
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?