Beloborodyy v. Astrue
ORDER granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDERED that plaintiff's counsel is awarded attorney's fees in the amount $22,742.50 by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 04/22/14.(jhawk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00797-PAB
MIKHAIL A. BELOBORODYY,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees
under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) [Docket No. 18] filed by
plaintiff Mikhail A. Beloborodyy. Plaintiff’s motion indicates that the Commissioner
takes no position on this request.
On March 29, 2011, plaintiff filed a Complaint [Docket No. 1] seeking review of
the final decision of defendant Carolyn W. Colvin1 in her official capacity as the
Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying plaintiff’s claim for
disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 401-33. On September 25, 2013, the Court reversed the Commissioner’s denial of
benefits and remanded the case for an award of benefits. Docket No. 15. Based on
the remand proceedings, plaintiff was awarded past-due benefits from the Social
Security Administration in the amount of $90,970.00. Docket No. 18 at 2, ¶ 4. The
The caption reflects the current acting Commissioner of the Social Security
notice of award from the Social Security Administration withheld $22,742.50 from
plaintiff’s benefits in anticipation of this fee request. Id. at 4. Plaintiff received notice of
this award on November 11, 2013 and filed the motion for attorney’s fees on December
13, 2013. Docket No. 18 at 1. Thus, the motion is timely under Rule 60(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See McGraw v. Barnhart, 450 F.3d 493, 505 (10th
Cir. 2006) (“[a] motion for an award of fees under § 406(b)(1) should be filed within a
reasonable time of the Commissioner’s decision awarding benefits”).
In the present motion, plaintiff requests that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), the
Court grant his attorney, Ann J. Atkinson, $22,742.50 in attorney’s fees in connection
with this case. Docket No. 18 at 1. Plaintiff states that he entered into a contingent fee
agreement with Ms. Atkinson wherein he agreed to pay Ms. Atkinson 25% of any pastdue disability award granted upon the successful outcome of this action. Docket No. 18
at 3, ¶ 6; Docket No. 18-4. Plaintiff informs the Court that, if Ms. Atkinson is granted the
requested award, then Ms. Atkinson will reimburse plaintiff for the $3,515.02 in fees
awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Docket
No. 18 at 6, ¶ 10.
Section 406(b) of Title 42 of the United States Code provides, in pertinent part,
that “[w]henever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this
subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney, the court may
determine and allow as part of its judgment a reasonable fee for such representation,
not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is
entitled by reason of such judgment.”
Despite a contingent-fee agreement, courts must review the reasonableness of
the fees yielded by the agreement to ensure that the attorney’s recovery is based on
the character of the representation and the results achieved. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart,
535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002). Moreover, if claimant’s counsel is awarded fees under both
the EAJA and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1), counsel must refund the smaller award to the
claimant. See id. at 796.
In district court litigation, Ms. Atkinson’s affidavit states that she spent 18.9 hours
representing plaintiff in this case and estimates expending another three to five hours
assisting plaintiff and his family in obtaining the awarded benefits. Docket No. 18-2 at
2, ¶ 3. Ms. Atkinson undertook a substantial risk of loss in connection with the case,
devoted considerable time and effort in presenting plaintiff’s position, and obtained a
favorable result for plaintiff. In addition, Ms. Atkinson has over 26 years of experience
representing claimants in Social Security disability cases, from which she has gained
skills that enable her to decrease the number of hours necessary to prosecute a
particular case. Morever, given that Ms. Atkinson will refund the lesser of either any
attorney’s fee award under the EAJA or pursuant to this motion, the net fee paid by
plaintiff to Ms. Atkinson will be the agreed amount of 25% of past-due benefits. Thus,
the Court concludes that an attorney’s fee of $22,742.50 is reasonable.
Wherefore, it is
ORDERED that plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees under 42
U.S.C. § 406(b) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) [Docket No. 18] is GRANTED. It is
ORDERED that plaintiff’s counsel is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of
DATED April 22, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?