Carlos v. Gomez et al

Filing 57

ORDER DISMISSING PARTIES. The 56 Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of Claims Asserted Against Defendants Gomez and Denver is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against defendants, Denise Gomez and The City and County of Denver, are DISMISSED WITH PREJ UDICE, with the parties to bear their attorney fees and costs. Defendants, Denise Gomez and The City and County of Denver, are DROPPED as parties to this action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/26/2011.(wjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-00810-REB-KMT
LUIZ MANUEL CARLOS,
Plaintiff,
v.
DENISE GOMEZ,
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, and
THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO,
Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING PARTIES
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of Claims
Asserted Against Defendants Gomez and Denver [#56] filed December 23, 2011.
After careful review of the stipulated motion and the file, I conclude that the stipulation
should be approved and that the plaintiff’s claims against defendants, Denise Gomez
and The City and County of Denver, should be dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal of Claims Asserted Against
Defendants Gomez and Denver [#56] filed December 23, 2011, is GRANTED;
2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendants, Denise Gomez and The City and
County of Denver, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with the parties to bear their
attorney fees and costs; and
3. That defendants, Denise Gomez and The City and County of Denver, are
DROPPED as parties to this action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly.

Dated December 26, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2