Tyco International Ltd. v. Chartis Inc. et al

Filing 52

ORDER FOR REHEARING re 49 and 51 : the stay order is vacated and a hearing will be scheduled to reconsider the defendant's motion for summary judgment, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/14/2013. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 11-cv-00832-RPM ADT HOLDINGS, INC., ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., and AUTOMATED SECURITY CORP., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER FOR REHEARING _____________________________________________________________________ On January 20, 2012, this Court entered an Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment based on the conclusion that the breach of a contractual promise in a willful and wanton manner is not equivalent to the type of conduct that would make the insuring agreement unenforceable as a matter of public policy. On April 5, 2012, a stay order entered because of the expectation that the resolution of the appeal in the underlying action may clarify the conduct which constitutes a willful and wanton breach of a commercial contract. The Colorado Court of Appeals has now issued its decision as submitted in the attachment to the Plaintiffs’ Advice of Resolution of Appeal in Related Case, filed May 7, 2013. Upon review of that opinion and the discussion of willful and wanton breach of contract contained there, it is determined that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment should be reheard. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the stay order is vacated and a hearing will be scheduled to reconsider the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. DATED: May 14th, 2013 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?