Janke et al v. Brooks et al

Filing 57

ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 52 Defendants Motion to Compel Responses to Second Set of Discovery Requests. The plaintiffs shall make supplemental discovery responses that conform to the formalities of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and shall allow the requested inspections on or before February 17, 2012; and The defendants oral motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline is DENIED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/30/12.(bnbcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00837-REB-BNB
TERRY A. JANKE, and
MICHELE JANKE.
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONALD BROOKS,
NORMANDY BROOKS, individuals d/b/a B&T Custom Rod & Restoration, and
B&T AUTOMOTIVE, INC., a Nevada corporation,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Responses to Second Set of
Discovery Requests [Doc. # 52, filed 12/30/2011] (the “Motion to Compel”). I held a hearing
on the Motion to Compel this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated
here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 52] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN

PART as follows:
• GRANTED with respect to Interrogatories 7 and 9;
•GRANTED with respect to Requests for Production 13a, 13b, 14, and 15;
• DENIED in all other respects;
(2)

The plaintiffs shall make supplemental discovery responses that conform to the

formalities of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and shall allow the requested inspections on

or before February 17, 2012; and
(3)

The defendants’ oral motion to extend the dispositive motion deadline is

DENIED.
Dated January 30, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2