BluMedia Inc. v. Sordid Ones BV

Filing 6

ORDER re: 4 and 3 Allowing Alternate Service of the Summonsand Complaint on Defendants, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/4/2011. (rpmcd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00856-RPM BLUMEDIA INC., a Colorado Corporation, a/k/a Intense Cash d/b/a BrokeStraightBoys.com and d/b/a BrokeStraightGuys.com; Plaintiff, v. SORDID ONES BV dba GAYGRAVY.com and DeeCash dba TripleXCash and dba TripleXCash.com And dba MitZasInc.com and dba DeeDevelopments.com dba ADULTDEVELOPMENTS.com and dba STUDPAY.com and JOHN DOES 1-20, JANE DOES 1-20, and XYZ Companies 1-20 Defendants. _________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ALLOWING MOTION FOR ALTERNATE SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANTS _________________________________________________________________________________ Upon review of the motion for alternate service, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Permitting Alternate Service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendants Sordid Ones BV dba Gaygravy.com, and DeeCash dba TripleXCash and dba TripleXCash.com and dba MitZasInc.com and DeeDevelopments.com AdultDevelopments.com and StudPay.com is granted. Plaintiff BluMedia Inc. is therefore permitted to serve the summons and complaint in the above-captioned case via email on Defendants Sordid Ones BV dba Gaygravy.com, and DeeCash dba TripleXCash and dba TripleXCash.com and dba MitZasInc.com and DeeDevelopments.com AdultDevelopments.com and StudPay.com via email at the following email addresses: matt@mpcollins.com; Jason@sobvsites.com; Terrence@deedevelopments.com; Nick@TripleXCash.com; Nick@GayGravy.com; Richard@DeeCash.com; Richard@MitZasInc.com Dated: August 4th, 2011 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _____________________________ Hon. Richard P. Matsch United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?