Mans v. Astrue

Filing 10

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/9/2011. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/8/2011. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/23/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/6/11. (gmssl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00922-AP
DEREK WARD MANS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
____________________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:
Patrick C.H. Spencer, II
830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 230
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
[phone]
[e-mail]

For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
Kevin T. Traskos
Deputy Civil Chief
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
William G. Pharo
United States Attorney Office
District of Colorado
Michael Howard
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 17th St.
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g).

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint was filed: April 6, 2011
B. Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: April 11, 2011
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: June 10, 2011

4.

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties state that, to the best of their knowledge, the administrative record is
complete.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not intend to submit additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASES RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims
or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule
A. Plaintiff’s opening brief due: August 9, 2011
B. Defendant’s response brief due: September 8, 2011
C. Plaintiff’s reply brief (if any) due: September 23, 2011

2

9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.

10.

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.

11.

OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR
CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 7.1(C) BY
SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED
UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 6th day of July, 2011.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

3

APPROVED:
/s/ Patrick C.H. Spencer, II
Patrick C.H. Spencer, II
830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 230
Colorado Springs, CO 80906
[phone]
[e-mail]

John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
Kevin T. Traskos
Deputy Civil Chief
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
William G. Pharo
United States Attorney Office
District of Colorado
/s/ Michael S. Howard
Michael Howard
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 17th St.
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

4