Harrington v. Champps Operating Corporation et al

Filing 10

ORDER re: 7 Minute Order, IT IS ORDERED that the Minute Order 7 , filed 4/25/2011 was entered in error and is WITHDRAWN. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/2/2011. (erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00942-CMA-BNB KRISTIN K. HARRINGTON, Plaintiff, v. CHAMPPS OPERATING CORPORATION, FOX & HOUND RESTAURANT GROUP, CHAMPPS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., CHAMPPS AMERICANA, JAMES T. ZEILKE, and KEVIN M. O’HARE, Defendants. ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ At a status conference held on April 25, 2011, the parties informed me that they understood that Defendants’ Motion to Strike [Doc. # 1-16] was pending and unresolved at the time the case was transferred to this court. Consequently, at the parties’ request, I set a briefing schedule in connection with the Motion to Strike. See Minute Order [Doc. # 7, filed 4/25/2011]. On further review, it appears that the Motion to Strike originally was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois as Doc. # 7, and that it was “terminated as moot” in the transfer order. See Doc. # 1 at Docket Entry Text (stating that “Defendants’ motions to strike are terminated as moot [7 & 14]”). The parties were mistaken when they stated that the Motion to Strike was unresolved. Because the Motion to Strike has been denied, no briefing schedule is necessary. IT IS ORDERED that the Minute Order [Doc. # 7, filed 4/25/2011] was entered in error and is WITHDRAWN. Dated May 2, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?