Timothy John Kennedy v. Mark Finely, et al

Filing 113

ORDER Of Dismissal. Joint Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice [# 111 ] filed in Civil Action No. 11-cv-00967-REB-KMT, on June 23, 2014, is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/24/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 11-cv-00967-REB-KMT (Consolidated with Civil Action No. 11-cv-03270-REB-KMT) TIMOTHY JOHN KENNEDY, Plaintiff, v. MARK A. FINLEY, ERNEST ROGER PEELE, SHERIFF JOHN WESLEY ANDERSON, and EL PASO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The following motions are before the court for consideration: (1) the Joint Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#111]1 filed in Civil Action No. 11-cv-00967 on June 23, 2014; and (2) the Joint Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#25], filed in the consolidated case, 11-cv-03270-REB-KMT, on June 23, 2014. After reviewing the motions and the record, I conclude that the motions should be granted and these actions should be dismissed without prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Joint Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#111] filed in Civil Action No. 11-cv-00967-REB-KMT, on June 23, 2014, is GRANTED; 1 “[#111]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That civil action 11-cv-00967-REB-KMT is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs; 3. That the Joint Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#25], filed in the consolidated case, 11-cv-03270-REB-KMT, on June 23, 2014, is GRANTED; and 4. That civil action 11-cv-03270-REB-KMT is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated June 24, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?