Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 159

MINUTE ORDER striking 154 Motion to the Court to Not Deny Plaintiff Charges Against the Defendant. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/27/12. (kfinn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
KATHLEEN CHYTKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court to Not Deny
Plaintiff Charges Against the Defendant [Docket No. 154; Filed November 21, 2012] (the
“Motion”).
The Court has repeatedly reminded Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she must
comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. See, e.g., [#36, #42, #45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89,
#148, #151]. Plaintiff must tell the Court in her motions whether opposing counsel opposes
the relief she requests or whether opposing counsel agrees to the relief she requests.
Plaintiff must tell the Court when and how she has attempted to confer with Defendant over
the content of her motions. The Motion does not provide this information. Plaintiff has also
been warned that motions that do not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. will be
summarily stricken from the record. See, e.g., [#52, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151].
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#154] is STRICKEN.

Dated: November 27, 2012

1