Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 170

MINUTE ORDER; 162 Motion for Order, 163 Motion for Order, 164 Motion for Ruling, 165 Motion for Leave and 166 Motion for Order are STICKEN, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/17/2012.(klmcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
KATHLEEN CHYTKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court for Answer to My
Summery of Judgement for $1,4 13122.27 or Are We Going to Court for a Jury Trial
for the Amount of $3,999999.99 and It Will Start Go Up as the Months and Years Go
on. . The Plaintiff Want to Know Why the Court is Holding Up Making a Decision on
the Plaintiffs Summery of Judgement with All the Evidence the Plaintiff Has Put in
and the Defendant Has Nothing? [sic] [Docket No. 162; Filed December 3, 2012]; on
Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court That Non of the Plaintiff Charges Against the Defendant
Will Never Be Exhausted or Dropped for the Plaintiff Until This Case Is Settled Either
in a Summery of Judgement or in a Jury Trial [sic] [Docket No. 163; Filed December 3,
2012]; on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court That the Court Make a Decision on Which Way
They Are Going If They Are Ruling for me the Plaintiff for Her Summery of Judgment
or If This Is Going to a Jury Trial With All the Evidence I Have in With the Court. That
I Denie the Extension the Defendant is Asking for Because I Feel the Defendant Just
Wants the Court to Keep Prolonging This Case and I Will Not Give Up We will All be
Moving Out Here to Fight This If Need Be [sic] [Docket No. 164; Filed December 13,
2012]; on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court Motion to the Court That I Am Allowed to Be
Emailed Any and All Paper Work That Pertains to This Case. That None of the
Charges Against the Defendant Will Ever Be Exhausted or Dropped for the Plaintiff
Until the Case is Settled Either by the Court or by a Jury Trial [sic] [Docket No. 165;
Filed December 13, 2012]; and on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court I the Plaintiff Denies
the Extension the Defendant Is Asking for Because I Feel the Defendant Just Wants
the Court to Keep Prolonging This Case and I the Plaintiff Will Not Give Up We Will
be Moving Out Here to Fight This Depending on the Courts Decision If the Plaintiff
1

Gets a Jury Trial and Has to Keep Fighting This or Will the Court Allow the Plaintiff
Her Summery of Judgement So the Plaintiff Can Move on With Her Life and This Can
Finally Be Ended. On the Grounds That the Defendants Attorneys Had From 12-32012 to 12-13-2012 to Rebuttle on Plaintiff Papers Put Into the Court [sic] [Docket No.
166; Filed December 13, 2012] (collectively, the “Motions”).
The Court has repeatedly reminded Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she must
comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. See, e.g., [#36, #42, #45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89,
#148, #151]. Plaintiff must tell the Court in her motions whether opposing counsel opposes
the relief she requests or whether opposing counsel agrees to the relief she requests.
Plaintiff must tell the Court when and how she has attempted to confer with Defendant over
the content of her motions. The Motion does not provide this information. Plaintiff has also
been warned that motions that do not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. will be
summarily stricken from the record. See, e.g., [#52, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151].
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#162, #163, #164, #165, #166] are
STRICKEN.

Dated: December 17, 2012

2