Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 184

MINUTE ORDER. Motions [180, 181, 182] are STRICKEN. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/17/13. (kfinn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
KATHLEEN CHYTKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court to Have the
Defendant Email the Plaintiff Information So the Plaintiff Will Know What Information
the Court Needs That the Court Does Not All Ready Have That Proves the Plaintiffs
Case in Exhibits or Any Other Information. And Allow the Plaintiff Time to Get Back
to Colorado With the Plaintiffs Daughter and Her Baby Which I Am Trying to Find Out
How Soon the Baby and My Daughter Will Be Able to Travel [sic] [Docket No.180; Filed
January 9, 2013]; on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court: Again the Plaintiff Is Asking the
Court to for a Motion for the Court to Make a Decision on the Plaintiffs Summery of
Judgement or a Decision for a Jury Trial Against the Defendant, to Show that the
Court is Not Prejudice or Discriminating Against the Plaintiff. On the Following
Grounds [sic] [Docket No. 181; Filed January 9, 2013]; and on Plaintiff’s Motion to the
Court That If Any Documents Are Needed from the Plaintiff on Friday 1-11-2013 and
the Plaintiff Has Not Been Emailed Any Thing from the Defendants Attorneys as to
What If Any Thing Is Going On or Needs to Be Filed That the Plaintiff Will Need Time
and the Information That the Court Needs on the Ground That the Plaintiff Needs to
Know If the Defendant is Getting the Information in the Same Formant at the Court
Is Giving the Plaintiff the Information [sic] [Docket No. 182; Filed January 9, 2013]
(collectively, the “Motions”).
Once again, the Court notes that it has repeatedly reminded Plaintiff, who is
proceeding pro se, that she must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. See, e.g., [#36, #42,
#45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151, #170, #178]. Plaintiff must tell the Court in her
motions whether opposing counsel opposes the relief she requests or whether opposing
1

counsel agrees to the relief she requests. Plaintiff must tell the Court when and how she
has attempted to confer with Defendant over the content of her motions. The Motions do
not provide this information. Plaintiff has also been repeatedly warned that motions that
do not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. will be summarily stricken from the record.
See, e.g., [#52, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151, #170, #178]. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#180, #181, #182] are STRICKEN.
However, as a courtesy to Plaintiff, the Court notes that the District Judge will issue
an Order in due course on the Recommendation [#146] issued on November 13, 2012,
regarding the Motions for Summary Judgment [#81, #115].

Dated: January 17, 2013

2