Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 206

MINUTE ORDER; Plaintiff's 204 Motion to Clarify is STRICKEN, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/11/2013.(klmcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
KATHLEEN CHYTKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court If the Court is not
Prejudice and Discriminating against the Pro Se White American Female single
mother Plaintiff than the Pre trial that the Court is setting up will not stop the Plaintiff
from getting a Jury trial. On the Following grounds that a pre trial is not stated here
unless the Party is giving up their rights to a jury trial which the Plaintiff does not
want to give up her right to a jury trial in this case. On the Grounds that the Plaintiff
amount of 5 Million Dollars is what the Plaintiff is asking for in the Pre Trial and the
Jury trial unless the Defendants wants to settle for the $1,413122.27 the Plaintiff is
asking in the Plaintiff summery of judgment [Docket No. 204; Filed March 5, 2013] (the
“Motion”).
Yet again, the Court notes that it has repeatedly reminded Plaintiff, who is
proceeding pro se, that she must comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. See, e.g., [#36, #42,
#45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151, #170, #178, #184, #202]. Plaintiff must tell the
Court in her motions whether opposing counsel opposes the relief she requests or whether
opposing counsel agrees to the relief she requests. Plaintiff must tell the Court when and
how she has attempted to confer with Defendant over the content of her motions. The
Motions do not provide this information. If Plaintiff does not understand this requirement,
she must ask the Court how she can comply. Plaintiff has also been repeatedly warned
that motions that do not comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. will be summarily stricken
from the record. See, e.g., [#52, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151, #170, #178, #184, #202].
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#204] is STRICKEN.
1

However, as a courtesy to Plaintiff, the Court notes a Final Pretrial Conference does
not prevent her from obtaining a jury trial. Rather, Plaintiff must attend the Final Pretrial
Conference and help prepare the proposed pretrial order so that a trial in this matter can
be set by the District Judge.

Dated: March 11, 2013

2