Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.
MINUTE ORDER striking 209 Motion for Discovery. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a hard copy of the Court's Minute Order 206 to Plaintiff at the address listed on the electronic docket. Defendant's Motion 207 addresses whether the Co urt has subject matter jurisdiction over the remaining claim in this action. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/9/2013 at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED. It shall be reset, if necessary, after final disposition of Defendant's Motion 207 . Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendant's Motion 207 on or before 4/4/2013. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/18/13. (kfinn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Failure to Train
Claim for Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies [Docket No. 207; Filed March
14, 2013] (“Defendant’s Motion”) and on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court to Allow the
Plaintiff Discovery to Be Allowed in to the Jury Trial. 2. Motion to the Court That the
Plaintiff Did Not Get to See What the Court Decided on the Last Motion the Plaintiff
Put In. So the Plaintiff Does Not Know What the Court State About the Plaintiff
Motion. Because It Would Not Open So the Plaintiff Could See It and a Copy Was Not
Sent to the Plaintiff P.O. Box. The Plaintiff is Requesting a Copy From the Court.
[Docket No. 209; Filed March 14, 2013] (“Plaintiff’s Motion”).
First addressing, Plaintiff’s Motion [#209], the Court notes yet again that it has
repeatedly reminded Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she must comply with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. See, e.g., [#36, #42, #45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151,
#170, #178, #184, #202, #206]. Plaintiff must tell the Court in her motions whether
opposing counsel opposes the relief she requests or whether opposing counsel agrees to
the relief she requests. Plaintiff must tell the Court when and how she has attempted to
confer with Defendant over the content of her motions. The Motions do not provide this
information. If Plaintiff does not understand this requirement, she must ask the Court how
she can comply. Plaintiff has also been repeatedly warned that motions that do not comply
with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A. will be summarily stricken from the record. See, e.g., [#52,
#73, #85, #89, #148, #151, #170, #178, #184, #202, #206]. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#209] is STRICKEN. However, as a
courtesy to Plaintiff,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a hard copy of the
Court’s Minute Order [#206] to Plaintiff at the address listed on the electronic docket.
Defendant’s Motion [#207] addresses whether the Court has subject matter
jurisdiction over the remaining claim in this action. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference set for April 9, 2013
at 11:00 a.m. is VACATED. It shall be reset, if necessary, after final disposition of
Defendant’s Motion [#207].
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendant’s Motion
[#207] on or before April 4, 2013.
Dated: March 18, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?