Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 224

MINUTE ORDER striking 220 Motion for Order. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/2/13. (kfinn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
KATHLEEN CHYTKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to the Court to Answer
Following Questions As To Why They Will Allow the Defendant All the Right and an
American Female Pro Se Plaintiff No Rights in Court of Law [sic] [Docket No. 220; Filed
March 28, 2013] (the “Motion”). As a preliminary matter, the Motion does not comply with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A., which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
As Plaintiff has been told many times before [#36, #42, #45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89, #148,
#151, #170, #178, #184, #198, #202, #206, #219], on this basis alone, the Motion is subject
to being stricken. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#220] is STRICKEN for failure to comply
with Local Rule 7.1A.

Dated: April 2, 2013

1