Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 242

MINUTE ORDER striking 238 Plaintiff's untitled Motion for Order. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/3/13.(mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM KATHLEEN CHYTKA, Plaintiff, v. WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC., Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s untitled Motion for Order [Docket No. 238; Filed May 21, 2013] (the “Motion”).1 As a preliminary matter, the Motion does not appear to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A., which provides as follows: The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule. As Plaintiff has been told many times before [#36, #42, #45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89, #148, #151, #170, #178, #184, #198, #202, #206, #219, #224, #233], on this basis alone, the Motion is subject to being stricken. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#238] is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Local Rule 7.1A. Dated: June 3, 2013 1 The title of Plaintiff’s Motion spans three pages and shall not be recited in full here. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?