Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 242

MINUTE ORDER striking 238 Plaintiff's untitled Motion for Order. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/3/13.(mjgsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
KATHLEEN CHYTKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s untitled Motion for Order [Docket No.
238; Filed May 21, 2013] (the “Motion”).1 As a preliminary matter, the Motion does not
appear to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A., which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
As Plaintiff has been told many times before [#36, #42, #45, #52, #67, #73, #85, #89, #148,
#151, #170, #178, #184, #198, #202, #206, #219, #224, #233], on this basis alone, the
Motion is subject to being stricken. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#238] is STRICKEN for failure to comply
with Local Rule 7.1A.
Dated: June 3, 2013

1

The title of Plaintiff’s Motion spans three pages and shall not be recited in full here.

1