Chytka v. Wright Tree Service, Inc.

Filing 316

MINUTE ORDER denying 312 Motion to Chief Judge Krieger ThatMagistrate Mix Should Be With Drawn From This Case and the Status ConferenceShould Be Vacated Until I the Pro Se Get the Exhibits that Show Why I the Pro SePlaintiff Charges Were Dropped A gainst the Defendant and That Magistrate MixShould Have been Conferring With You on Her Actions in this Case. 2. Motion forChief Judge Krieger to Over See This Case to Make Decision on This Case. See asFollows and 314 Motion toChief Judge Krieger , Blackburn and Magistrate Mix to Send I the Pro Se Plaintiff theExhibits the Defendant Filed With the Court That Shows Why I the Pro Se PlaintiffsCharges Were Dismissed By the Court Judges in This Case and to Reinstate I thePro Se Plaintiff Charges on This Day September 24 2013 on the Grounds the Courtand the Defendant Has Yet to Show Why the Pro Se Plaintiffs Charges WereDismissed By the Court. Send to Below Address. And to Resinstate All Charges ThatWere Dismissed Against the Defendant. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/2/2013.(klyon, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00968-REB-KLM
KATHLEEN CHYTKA,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGHT TREE SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Chief Judge Krieger That
Magistrate Mix Should Be With Drawn From This Case and the Status Conference
Should Be Vacated Until I the Pro Se Get the Exhibits that Show Why I the Pro Se
Plaintiff Charges Were Dropped Against the Defendant and That Magistrate Mix
Should Have been Conferring With You on Her Actions in this Case. 2. Motion for
Chief Judge Krieger to Over See This Case to Make Decision on This Case. See as
Follows. [sic] [Docket No. #312; Filed September 23, 2013] and on Plaintiff’s Motion to
Chief Judge Krieger, Blackburn and Magistrate Mix to Send I the Pro Se Plaintiff the
Exhibits the Defendant Filed With the Court That Shows Why I the Pro Se Plaintiffs
Charges Were Dismissed By the Court Judges in This Case and to Reinstate I the
Pro Se Plaintiff Charges on This Day September 24 2013 on the Grounds the Court
and the Defendant Has Yet to Show Why the Pro Se Plaintiffs Charges Were
Dismissed By the Court. Send to Below Address. And to Resinstate All Charges That
Were Dismissed Against the Defendant [Docket No. 314; Filed September 24, 2013]
(collectively, the “Motions”).
Plaintiff seeks no relief that she has not already sought and been denied. See Order
[#267]; Minute Orders [#300, #308]. Plaintiff provides no new facts necessitating
reconsideration of these prior Orders. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#312, #314] are DENIED.
Dated: October 2, 2013

-1-