Gorsuch, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Association

Filing 35

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 33 Joint Motion to Approve Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Confidentiality. The proposed Stipulated Protective Order is refused. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike the "Stipulation" filed at docket # 32 . By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/3/11.(mnf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00970-PAB-MEH
GORSUCH, LTD., a Colorado corporation,
GORSUCH, LTD., B.C., a Colorado corporation,
GORSUCH, LIMITED AT ASPEN, a Colorado corporation,
GORSUCH, LIMITED AT KEYSTONE, a Colorado corporation, and
GORSUCH COOPER, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 3, 2011.
The Joint Motion to Approve Stipulated Protective Order Regarding Confidentiality [filed
August 2, 2011; docket #33] is denied without prejudice, and the proposed Stipulated Protective
Order is refused. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike the “Stipulation” filed at docket #32.
The parties are granted leave to re-file the motion and attach to the motion a revised proposed
protective order consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo.
2000), in which the Court identifies the proper mechanism by which the parties may challenge the
designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89.