Gorsuch, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Association
Filing
40
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/5/11. (mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00970-PAB-MEH
GORSUCH, LTD., a Colorado corporation,
GORSUCH, LTD, B.C., a Colorado corporation,
GORSUCH, LIMITED AT ASPEN, a Colorado corporation,
GORSUCH, LIMITED AT KEYSTONE MOUNTAIN, a Colorado corporation, and
GORSUCH COOPER, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION.
Defendant.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY
The parties hereby stipulate and the Court ORDERS:
1.
The purpose of this Stipulated Protective Order is to facilitate expeditious discovery
and exchange of information and document in this litigation and protect the interests of the parties
in their confidential and commercially-sensitive information and documents in accordance with Fed.
R. Civ. P. 26 (c)(7). This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, and information,
including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests
for admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or
discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2.
As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as provided in Fed.R.Civ.P.
34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term.
3.
Any party may designate as “Confidential” information in any form that is produced,
disclosed or otherwise provided during discovery in this litigation if the parties in good faith that
there is good cause to treat the information as confidential because it contains non-public financial,
trade secret, or commercial information. Nothing in this Stipulation shall prevent a party from
arguing that a waiver of confidentiality, attorney/client privilege or work product resulted from
disclosure, filing or production of documents and/or information, notwithstanding that such
documents are or may be marked “Confidential” in this proceeding. Finally, documents which are
filed with any governmental or regulatory agency, such as the Securities Exchange Commission,
which documents are available to the public shall not be treated as “Confidential.”
4.
Documents under this order to be protected from disclosure shall be designated as
“Confidential” by the party producing them.
5.
“Confidential” information other than documents shall be clearly designated as
“Confidential” at the time of disclosure, or by a writing from the attorney for the party claiming
confidentiality within ten (10) days following receipt of the transcript or other document that
formally memorializes the information.
6.
If a party inadvertently fails to designate information as “Confidential” when that
information is produced, disclosed, or otherwise provided in this litigation, the party shall give
notice to the other parties of the inadvertent omission promptly upon discovery thereof, and the
information shall thenceforth be treated as if the designation as “Confidential” had been made when
the information was first produced, disclosed, or otherwise provided in this litigation.
7.
If a party inadvertently disclosed information it believes is subject to any claim of
privilege, it shall give notice to the other parties of the inadvertent disclosure promptly upon
discovery thereof. The party that received the information shall return the information and make
no use of it in the case.
8.
“Confidential” information shall be used solely for the purpose of this action
(including any appeals), and not in any other litigation, and not for any business or other purpose
whatsoever. “Confidential” information may not be disclosed to anyone unless expressly provided
for herein:
a.
A party may, without any waiver of “Confidential” status, disclose to any
person “Confidential” information of which it is the source.
b.
A party may disclose “Confidential” information of which it is not the source
as follows:
i)
“Confidential” information may be used in the taking of testimony at,
or in defending, any deposition, hearing or trial in this action.
ii)
“Confidential” information may be used in any oral or written
iii)
“Confidential” information may be shown to any witness or potential
argument in the case.
witness in interviews or in preparation for any deposition, hearing or trial, and at any deposition,
hearing or trial.
iv)
“Confidential” information may be disclosed to the Court and its
personnel, including court reporters.
v)
“Confidential” information may be disclosed to employees and
members of the law firms of counsel of record (including in-house counsel for the defendant and
employees acting on their behalf).
vi)
“Confidential” information may be disclosed to experts and
independent consultants engaged by counsel of record, and to employees of such experts or
consultants, after they have signed an Affidavit in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto.
vii)
“Confidential” information may be disclosed to all parties, including
officers, directors, and employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (and its affiliates, parents
and subdivisions), both present and former, who are providing assistance to counsel in the defense
of this matter.
viii)
“Confidential” information may be disclosed to any other person if
(i) the parties agree after conferring in good faith that the person may have access to “Confidential”
information; or (ii) the Court orders upon Motion with good cause shown that the person may have
access to “Confidential” information.
9.
Except as otherwise provided in this Order, any disclosure or dissemination of
“Confidential” information shall be preceded by execution of an Affidavit substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
10.
Although the confidentiality requirements of this Protective Order shall in all other
respects apply to the following persons, such Affidavits shall not be required of:
a.
Counsel of record and legal, paralegal, clerical, secretarial, and other persons
employed by counsel of record for any party on a regular basis and not solely for purposes of the
instant litigation; and
b.
The parties (and their affiliates, parents and subdivisions), or their employees,
officers, and directors, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for the carrying out of their
respective duties in connection with this litigation.
11.
Counsel of record shall retain throughout this litigation the Affidavits executed by
parties receiving “Confidential” information pursuant to this Protective Order, and shall then
exchange them upon request at the conclusion of the litigation (meaning final judgment and
exhaustion of all appeals). If any party has good cause to believe that another party has improperly
disclosed “Confidential” information, it may move for an order allowing it to inspect the Affidavits
before the conclusion of the litigation.
12.
Within 6 months of the conclusion of this litigation (meaning final judgment and
exhaustion of all appeals), everyone other than counsel of record to whom “Confidential”
information has been disclosed pursuant to paragraph 7 above shall return that information to the
counsel of record who disclosed it; counsel of record shall then arrange for the return at the expense
of the designating party of all “Confidential” information and all copies thereof to the party that
designated the information as “Confidential,” or shall, at the option of the designating party, arrange
for the “Confidential” information and all copies thereof to be destroyed. Upon request, counsel of
record shall certify in writing that they have complied with this paragraph. If requested to do so by
the counsel of record who disclosed “Confidential” information to them, persons other than counsel
of record to whom “Confidential” information has been disclosed also shall certify in writing that
they have complied with this paragraph.
13.
Nothing in this Protective Order shall affect the right of any party to seek greater
protection than that provided for herein for any information.
14.
A party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL information
by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. The written notice shall
identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection
within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the
party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL to file an appropriate motion requesting that
the Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this
Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be treated as
CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If
the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information
shall lose its designation as CONFIDENTIAL and shall not thereafter be treated as
CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with this Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed under
this provision, the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of
establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.
15.
This Protective Order shall be binding on any future party to this litigation.
16.
This Protective Order shall continue in force after the completion of this litigation.
17.
This Protective Order shall not prohibit a party from disclosing “Confidential”
information in response to a subpoena duly served on the party, provided that the subpoenaed party
notifies the designating party, in writing, prior to disclosure and within two (2) business days of
receipt of the subpoena, to allow the designating party the opportunity to object or respond to the
subpoena, and further provided that the subpoenaed party shall not disclose the “Confidential”
information prior to the later of the conclusion of ten (10) days after notice of the subpoena to the
designating party, or the time in which the Court rules on any motion objecting to the subpoena filed
by the designating party within such ten (10) day period.
18.
In entering into this Protective Order, the parties preserve all rights and objections
they may have to the use in this lawsuit of “Confidential” information.
19.
This stipulation may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same document.
Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 5th day of August, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge
SO STIPULATED:
This 3rd day of August, 2011.
Respectfully submitted,
By:
s/Richard B. Podoll
Richard B. Podoll, Esq.
Robert A. Kitsmiller, Esq.
PODOLL & PODOLL, P.C.
5619 DTC Parkway, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80111
Telephone: (303) 861-4000
Matthew C. Ferguson, Esq.
GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C.
601 East Hyman Avenue
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Telephone: (970) 925-1936
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
By:
s/Brian J. Berardini
Brian J. Berardini
David C. Walker
Brown, Berardini & Dunning
2000 South Colorado Blvd.
Tower Two, Suite 700
Denver, CO 80222
Telephone: (303) 329-3363
Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?