Lutalo v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al

Filing 74

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 70 Fourth Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines. Discovery due by 6/8/2012. Dispositive Motions due by 7/9/2012, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/3/12.(mjgsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-00974-REB-KLM OJORE N. LUTALO, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (“AMTRAK”), LENINOVA FAYDO, in her official and individual capacities, and JAMES BULLERWELL, II, in his official and individual capacities, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Fourth Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines [Docket No. 70; Filed May 2, 2012] (the “Motion”). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#70] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART. The Court grants the parties request to amend the Scheduling Order. Accordingly, the Scheduling Order [#23] entered on June 16, 2011, as amended on January 24, 2012 [#48], February 23, 2012 [#53], and March 16, 2012 [#57], is further modified to extend the following deadlines: • • Discovery Deadline Dispositive Motions Deadline June 8, 2012 July 9, 2012 The Discovery Deadline is extended for the sole purpose of taking the deposition of Leninova Faydo. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE PERMITTED, in light of the Final Pretrial Conference setting. The Court denies without prejudice the parties’ request for a telephone conference to discuss the trial calendar in light of these extensions. The Magistrate Judge has no control over the Trial Preparation Conference and trial settings on the District Judge’s calendar. To the extent that the parties seek to vacate those dates, they should file a motion. Dated: May 3, 2012 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?