Chavez v. County of Larimer, Colorado et al

Filing 146

MINUTE ORDER denying wihtout prejudice 143 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 02/15/2012.(wjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00988-MSK-MEH
MARTHA CHAVEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
COLLEEN CONWAY, L.P.N., in her individual and official capacities,
COREY SNYDER, R.N., in her individual and official capacities,
MARGO GEPPERT, M.D., in her individual and official capacities,
BRITANNY WILLIAMS, R.N., in her individual and official capacities,
ASHLEY SARGENT, R.N., in her individual and official capacities,
ELLEN SHAFER, R.N., in her individual and official capacities,
JOSEPH PETERSON, R.N., in his individual and official capacities,
JACK HALEY, P.A.-C., in his individual and official capacities,
SIERRA WRIGHT, R.N., in her individual and official capacities,
TERESA RAMIREZ, L.P.N., inher individual and official capacities,
DENISE GROSS, L.P.N., in her individual and official capacities,
CHRISTINA MARSHALL, L.P.N., in her individual and official capacities,
KIM STEPHENS, L.P.N., in her individual and official capacities,
PHILLIP CONNER, M.A., in his individual and official capacities,
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC., a Colorado corporation,
DEBORAH MOUSTEN, in her individual and official capacities, and
LEE SOUCY, in his individual and official capacities,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on February 15, 2012.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint [filed February 14, 2012; docket #143] is denied
without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select
Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations
by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or
voicemail). Moreover, the tendered amended pleading fails to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR
10.1E.
The Plaintiff may re-file her motion in accordance with these and other applicable local and
federal rules on or before February 17, 2012. The Plaintiff is reminded that any proposed pleading
or order should be attached to the motion, not filed separately from the motion.