CGC Holding Company, LLC et al v. Hutchens et al

Filing 118

MINUTE ORDER granting 117 The Hutchens Defendants' Unopposed Joinder Motion to Broad and Cassel Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. The Hutchens Defendants have to 9/22/2011 to file reply. Granting Defendants Alvin Meisel s and Blaney McMurtry LLP's 115 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. The Reply to Defendants Alvin Meisels' and Blaney McMurtry LLP's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) 114 is accepted for filing, by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/21/11.(lsw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-01012-WYD-KLM CGC HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; CRESCENT SOUND YACHT CLUB, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; HARLEM ALGONQUIN LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; and JAMES T. MEDICK; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SANDY HUTCHENS, a/k/a Fred Hayes, a/k/a Moishe Alexander, a/k/a Moshe Ben Avraham, et al., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL “The Hutchens Defendants’ Unopposed Joinder Motion to Broad and Cassel Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Briefs [Docket 109]” filed September 20, 2011 (ECF No. 117) is GRANTED. The Hutchens Defendants have up to and including Thursday, September 22, 2011, in which to file their reply briefs. Also, Defendants Alvin Meisels and Blaney McMurtry LLP’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Their Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction in Excess of Page Limitations filed September 19, 2011 (ECF No. 115) is GRANTED. The Reply to Defendants Alvin Meisels’ and Blaney McMurtry LLP’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (ECF No. 114) is accepted for filing. Dated: September 21, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?