CGC Holding Company, LLC et al v. Hutchens et al

Filing 134

MINUTE ENTRY for Hearing on Motions held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/12/2011. ORDERED: 72 74 75 82 83 84 85 86 92 Motions to Dismiss are taken under advisement. (Court Reporter: Kara Spitler) (lbush)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge R. Brooke Jackson Courtroom Deputy: LaDonne Bush Court Reporter: Kara Spitler Date: October 12, 2011 Civil Action No. 11-cv-01012-RBJ-KLM Parties: Counsel: CGC HOLDING COMPANY, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company; CRESCENT SOUND YACHT CLUB, LLC, a Florida limited liability company; HARLEM ALGONQUIN LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; and JAMES T. MEDICK; on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, John Head Plaintiffs, v. SANDY HUTCHENS, a/k/a Fred Hayes, a/k/a Moishe Alexander, a/k/a Moshe Ben Avraham; TANYA HUTCHENS; JENNIFER HUTCHENS, a/k/a Jennifer Araujo; CANADIAN FUNDING CORPORATION; an Ontario corporation; 308 ELGIN STREET INC., an Ontario corporation; FIRST CENTRAL MORTGAGE FUNDING INC., an Ontario corporation; FIRST CENTRAL HOLDINGS INC., an Ontario corporation; BARRY J. POULSON; ARSENAU POULSON, a partnership; ALVIN MEISELS; BLANEY McMURTRY LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership; Brett Wendt John Palmeri Heather Kelly James Kilroy John Mann Benjamin Petre Michael Frandina REZNICK, PARSONS, MEISELS, TABERNER, a partnership; RONALD GACHE; BROAD AND CASSEL, a partnership; H. JAN LUISTERMANS, a/k/a Herman Luisterman; REALTY 1 REAL ESTATE SERVICES LTD, an Ontario corporation; and DOE LIMITED 1 – 100, Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES Hearing on Motions 8:59 a.m. Court in session. Court’s preliminary comments. Discussion between the Court and Mr. Head, Mr. Wendt, Mr. Palmeri, Mr. Kilroy, and Mr. Mann regarding the issues for today’s hearing, the Canadian case and an evidentiary hearing. 9:59 a.m. Argument by Mr. Palmeri in support of two motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 85, 86). 10:23 a.m. Argument by Mr. Mann in support of one motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 74). 11:01 a.m. 11:17 a.m. Court in recess. Court in session. 11:18 a.m. Argument by Mr. Kilroy in support of two motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 72, 75). 11:50 a.m. Argument by Mr. Wendt in support of three motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 82, 83, 84). 12:08 p.m. 1:15 p.m. Court in recess. Court in session. With regard to his fourth motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 92), Mr. Wendt adopts the arguments he made this morning. 2 1:16 p.m. Argument by Mr. Head in opposition to the motions to dismiss. Mr. Palmeri states that Defendant Reznick, Parsons, Meisels, Taberner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 79) has been resolved and a stipulation will be filed. 2:23 p.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Palmeri. 2:30 p.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Mann. 2:39 p.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Kilroy. 2:43 p.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Wendt. ORDERED: Motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 72, 74, 75, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 92 ) are taken under advisement. 3:01 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Time: 4:39 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?