Amerson et al v. American Mortgage Network, Inc. et al
MINUTE ORDER granting 32 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Attend Scheduling Conference by Phone, and denying without prejudice 33 Plaintiffs' "Affidavit and Motion to Postpone Scheduling Conference, Due to Failure of Defendants to Establish Jurisdiction and Standing," by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/9/2011. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH
GALEN AMERSON and
FRANCES M. SCOTT,
AMERICAN MORTGAGE NETWORK, INC.,
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS), and
JOHN DOES (INVESTORS) 1 - 15,000,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 9, 2011.
Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Attend Scheduling Conference by Phone [filed August 8,
2011; docket #32] is granted. Plaintiff Galen Amerson may appear telephonically at the Scheduling
Conference on August 12, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. by calling Chambers at (303) 844-4507 at the
designated time. Plaintiff Frances Scott shall appear in person.
Plaintiffs’ “Affidavit and Motion to Postpone Scheduling Conference, Due to Failure of
Defendants to Establish Jurisdiction and Standing” [filed August 8, 2011; docket #33] is denied
without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court notes that
Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing jurisdiction and standing. Utah Animal Rights Coal. v. Salt
Lake Cnty., 566 F.3d 1236, 1240 (10th Cir. 2009) (“The party invoking federal jurisdiction - here,
the plaintiffs - bears the burden to demonstrate standing.” (citation omitted)).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?