Amerson et al v. American Mortgage Network, Inc. et al
ORDER re: 53 Defendants Chase Home Finance LLC and Fannie Mae's Motion to Dismiss and 56 Defendant Castle Meinhold & Stawiarski's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs shall submit supplemental briefing on or before 11/15/2011 specifying the Defendants to which they refer and whether their response 66 pertains to one or both of the motions to dismiss. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/10/2011. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH
GALEN AMERSON, and
FRANCES M. SCOTT,
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC,
FANNIE MAE, and
CASTLE MEINHOLD & STAWIARSKI, LLC,
Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are two motions to dismiss; one filed by Defendants Chase Home Finance
LLC and Fannie Mae (self-described “Bank Defendants”) [docket #53], and one filed by Defendant
Castle Meinhold & Stawiarski, LLC [docket #56]. On November 8, 2011, Plaintiffs filed “Plaintiffs’
Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss” [docket #66], but did not specify the
motion or the Defendant to which they were responding. In this case, there are three Defendants and
two motions to dismiss. It is unclear from Plaintiffs’ response whether Plaintiffs are referring to one
or all of the named Defendants, or to one or both of the pending motions. Thus, Plaintiffs are hereby
ORDERED to submit supplemental briefing on or before November 15, 2011 specifying 1) the
Defendants to which they refer; and 2) whether their response pertains to one or both of the motions
Dated and entered at Denver, Colorado, this 10th day of November, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?