Amerson et al v. American Mortgage Network, Inc. et al
MINUTE ORDER denying 74 Plaintiff's (sic) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/29/2011. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH
GALEN AMERSON, and
FRANCES M. SCOTT,
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC,
FANNIE MAE, and
CASTLE MEINHOLD & STAWIARSKI, LLC,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 29, 2011.
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s (sic) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions
[filed December 27, 2011; docket #74]. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2), a motion for sanctions
must not be filed or presented to the court until the opposing party has been served with the motion
and has been given 21 days in which to correct the alleged error. Plaintiffs do not represent that they
effected any service on Defendants, much less that they served Defendants 21 days prior to filing
the present motion. In light of Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G and Fed.
R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2), Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?