Amerson et al v. American Mortgage Network, Inc. et al

Filing 84

MINUTE ORDER striking 82 Plaintiff's (sic) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/24/2012. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-01041-WJM-MEH GALEN AMERSON, and FRANCES M. SCOTT, Plaintiffs, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, FANNIE MAE, and CASTLE MEINHOLD & STAWIARSKI, LLC, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 24, 2012. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s (sic) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions [filed January 23, 2011; docket #82]. To date, Plaintiffs have filed three motions for sanctions, all of which the Court has denied. Plaintiffs’ first motion for sanctions was denied without prejudice for failure to confer under D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A [docket #29], and Plaintiffs’ second motion was denied on the merits for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G and Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2) [docket #79]. The instant motion contains all three deficiencies; namely, Plaintiffs failed to confer under D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, failed to certify service on all Defendants, and failed to provide Defendants with the 21-day safe harbor provision required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2). Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion is stricken. Plaintiffs are admonished that their continued disregard for the federal and local rules may result in sanctions against them.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?