Williams et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. et al

Filing 28

MINUTE ORDER granting 24 Defendants U.S. Bank N.A.'s and America's Servicing Company's Second Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reschedule Scheduling/Planning Conference. The Scheduling Conference set for 8/31/2011 at 10:00 AM is vacated and will be reset, if appropriate, only upon a motion filed by Plaintiffs after the Order to Show Cause is resolved. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/12/11.(mnf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01059-PAB-KLM
LINDA S. WILLIAMS, and
THOMAS K. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., as nominee for Fieldstone
Mortgage Company,
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Sasco 2006-BC3, and
AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants U.S. Bank N.A.’s and America’s
Servicing Company’s Second Unopposed Motion to Vacate and Reschedule
Scheduling/Planning Conference [Docket No. 24; Filed August 10, 2011] (the “Motion”).
Despite the recent disbarment of Plaintiffs’ counsel, the Motion indicates that Defendants
conferred with him and that he consented to the request on Plaintiffs’ behalf.1 See Motion
[#24] at 1. Counsel’s continued representation of Plaintiffs, as well as their collective failure
to prosecute this case, are the subject of an Order to Show Cause issued by District Judge
Philip A. Brimmer on August 10, 2011 [Docket No. 25]. Given the current status of the
case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Scheduling
Conference set for August 31, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. is vacated and will be reset, if
appropriate, only upon a motion filed by Plaintiffs after the Order to Show Cause is
resolved. The motion must comply with all Federal and Local Rules.
Dated: August 12, 2011

1

Although counsel is not identified by name, as no other counsel has entered an
appearance on Plaintiffs’ behalf, the Court assumes that Defendants conferred with disbarred
counsel.