Green et al v. Drake Beam Morin, Inc.

Filing 73

ADDENDUM TO E-DISCOVERY PROTOCOL ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 3/12/12. (cbssec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case No. 11-cv-01063-REB-CBS JOHN GREEN and ELIZABETH ENRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DRAKE BEAM MORIN, INC., Defendant. ADDENDUM TO E-DISCOVERY PROTOCOL Pursuant to the Court’s Minute Entry (doc. #55) and the Court’s further direction during the Scheduling Conference on January 24, 2012, Plaintiffs and Defendant Drake Beam Morin, Inc. submit the following addendum to the e-discovery protocol for Court approval and inclusion in the Scheduling Order: 1. In this case, Plaintiffs allege that Defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay Plaintiffs and other similarly situated consultants for hours worked and failing to pay overtime. Defendant has denied the material allegations of Plaintiffs’ complaint and asserted various other defenses. The Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification (doc. #44). Notice was mailed on January 20, 2012. The notice period ends on April 19, 2012. 2. Plaintiffs took depositions of Defendant’s corporate representatives regarding IT topics on February 28, 2012. 3. Pursuant to the Court’s order, the parties have conferred regarding electronically stored information (“ESI”) that may be relevant to this matter following conditional certification, and have agreed on the following protocol for discovery of ESI. a. Electronic Scheduler, Orbit and Time Records Plaintiffs have requested, and Defendant has agreed to produce, Scheduler records, Orbit records, web time sheets and ADP records in electronic format for all opt-ins for the relevant time period. Defendant has agreed to begin production on a rolling basis. b. Electronic Time Stamps Plaintiffs have requested, and Defendant has agreed to produce, electronic time stamp logs for all opt-ins’ activity in Orbit, ADP, client portal, customer portal, mydbm.com, WebEx (if available from the vendor) and Microsoft live meeting (if available from the vendor) for the relevant time period. Defendant has agreed to begin production on a rolling basis. c. Email Plaintiffs have requested, and Defendant has agreed to produce, all email in the email boxes of all opt-ins in their native format. Further, Plaintiffs have requested, and Defendant has agreed to search, the email boxes of all employees with supervisory authority over consultants with agreed-upon search terms to be decided no later than April 1, 2012. Defendant has agreed to begin production on a rolling basis. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 12th day of March, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Craig B. Shaffer Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge APPROVED: /s/ Jack D. McInnes________ Jack D . McInnes Steve Siegel Hanson LLP 460 Nichols Road, Suite 200 Kansas City, Missouri 64112 Telephone: (816) 714-7100 Email: hanson@stuevesiegel.com paul@stuevesiegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Darin Mackender______________ Darin Mackender Fisher & Phillips LLP 1999 Broadway, Suite 3300 Denver, Colorado 80202 Telephone: (303) 218-3650 Telefax: (303) 218-3651 Email: dmackender@laborlawyers.com Attorneys for Defendant /s/ Daniel A. Sloane________________ Daniel A. Sloane Hillyard, Wahlberg, Kudla & Sloane LLP 4601 DTC Boulevard, Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 80237 Telephone: (303) 571-5302 Telefax: (303) 571-1806 Email: dan@hwkslaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?